← All resources

NIS2 Netherlands: is your manufacturing plant in scope?

Published October 26, 2026 · 8 min read · CyberNovaLabs.io

In the Netherlands NIS2 is called the Cyberbeveiligingswet, in force since 15 August 2026. For a factory the test is not "we make things": six precise Annex II categories decide, then company size. This guide gives the grid, the regulator, the registration desk and the reporting clock.

The short answer

NIS2 Netherlands, seen from a factory floor: part of Dutch manufacturing is in scope, not all of it. The Dutch transposition is called the Cyberbeveiligingswet (Cbw) and it entered into force on 15 August 2026[1][2]. The Dutch government estimates that around 8,000 organisations fall under the Cbw, and around 500 under the separate Wet weerbaarheid kritieke entiteiten[1].

For a manufacturer the test is not "we make things". It is first a specific activity category from Annex II of the directive, and then company size. If you produce machinery, electronics, electrical equipment, vehicles or medical devices, you are very likely in scope. If you do contract machining, sheet metal, plastics, packaging or furniture, you are probably not directly covered — and the supply chain will reach you anyway, through the security questionnaires of customers who are.

The six Annex II categories that decide

Annex II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 does not take "manufacturing" as a block. It lists precise activity divisions[7]:

CategoryNACEConcrete examples
Medical devices and in-vitro diagnostic devicesMDR / IVDR legal definitionimplants, sterile consumables, lab analysers
Computer, electronic and optical products26circuit boards, sensors, measuring instruments
Electrical equipment27motors, switchgear, batteries, cabling
Machinery and equipment n.e.c.28packaging lines, pumps, agricultural machinery
Motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers29tier 1 and tier 2 suppliers
Other transport equipment30shipyards, rail, aerospace

Watch the medical device trap: the Annex II entry points to the legal definition of a medical device, not to a single NACE division[7]. A machining subcontractor producing a critical implant part can therefore be in scope even though its KvK SBI code gives no hint of it.

Are you in scope? Four questions

And a fifth question that is not in the Act: do I supply an in-scope entity? If so the Cbw does not apply to you, but your customer's supply-chain obligations will reach you by contract.

NIS2 Netherlands: who supervises you, and where to register

Two authorities share Dutch manufacturing:

Registration is centralised: it runs through the Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum at mijn.ncsc.nl[1][4]. It was voluntary before entry into force; it is mandatory now[4]. This is the step manufacturers forget, because it does not look like an engineering project.

New front desk, 1 January 2026 — the Digital Trust Center was folded into the reinforced NCSC. Every Dutch organisation, in scope or not, now has a single point of contact for digital resilience[9]. If your bookmark still points at the DTC, change it.

The Act is live: what order to catch up in

  1. Settle scope in writing. One page: activity, Annex II category, headcount, turnover, balance sheet, conclusion, date, signature of a director. It is the first thing an inspector asks for.
  2. Register at mijn.ncsc.nl if you are in scope[4].
  3. Inventory the OT. PLCs, HMIs, gateways, remote maintenance access held by machine builders. A plant inventory that stops at office PCs is worthless.
  4. Write the reporting procedure before you need it: who decides an incident is "significant", who calls, which mijn.ncsc.nl account, which number at night.
  5. Lock the chain. Security requirements in maintenance contracts, and removal of dormant remote access.

Reporting an incident: 24 hours, 72 hours, one month

The deadlines sit in articles 26 to 29 of the Cyberbeveiligingswet, and they are tight[5]:

DeadlineWhat you sendArticle
Without delay and at the latest 24 hours after becoming awareearly warning: whether a malicious act is suspected, whether cross-border effects are possible, contact details of the responsible officerart. 26
Without delay and at the latest 72 hours after becoming awarenotification, with an update and an initial severity assessmentart. 27
On request of the CSIRT or the authorityintermediate reportart. 28
At the latest one month after the article 27 notificationfinal report; if the incident is still running at that date, a progress report, then the final report within one month of closureart. 29

Note the start of that last clock: one month after the notification, not after the incident. In a factory those 24 hours fall at night or at the weekend, when the line stops and the production team calls the machine supplier first. If your procedure is not posted where the line stops, it does not exist.

Fines and management accountability

The amounts are written into the Act itself, in articles 80 (essential entities) and 87 (important entities)[5]:

CategoryMaximum fine
Essential entity, breach of security or reporting duties10,000,000 euros or 2% of total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher
Important entity, same breaches7,000,000 euros or 1.4% of total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher
Any other infringement, in both cases1,000,000 euros

The Cbw also imposes management accountability, including an obligation of appropriate training[1], and the regulator supervises that duty at the level of individual board members, not only the company[11]. So the cheapest measure in the whole file is a documented half-day of board training.

What 356 self-assessments say about Dutch manufacturing

The RDI publishes its NIS2 Quickscan results by sector. For "vervaardiging", the questionnaire was fully completed 356 times between February 2024 and September 2025[3]. Respondents rate themselves reasonably well on authentication and incident handling, and clearly weaker on supply chain, reporting procedures and training[3]. The RDI states that this is a self-assessment and does not guarantee compliance[3].

That is useful for sequencing: where most Dutch manufacturers rate themselves weak is where the gap will show in the first inspections. The supply chain is also what your customers will ask about first — see our guide on answering a supplier security questionnaire.

The Dutch scheme few manufacturers use

The Cyberweerbaarheidscentrum Maakindustrie (CWM) was set up in Zuid-Holland by FME and the Koninklijke Metaalunie together with Hi Delta, Security Delta (HSD) and InnovationQuarter[10]. It offers a cyber-resilience measurement, practical advice, workshops, threat intelligence and access to experts, covering IT and OT[10]. It is not a national programme, and membership makes nobody compliant — but for a plant in Rotterdam or Delft it is the cheapest way in.

The first 5 actions

  1. Take the free NIS2 check, then the RDI NIS2-Zelfevaluatie, and file the result with a date on it.
  2. Register at mijn.ncsc.nl if you are in scope.
  3. List every machine supplier's remote access and cut the dormant ones this week.
  4. Write the 24h / 72h / 1 month procedure and post it where the line stops.
  5. Book the board training and keep the evidence.

Read next: our guide to NIS2 in Belgium for manufacturing and production, which uses the same grid with the CCB and the CyberFundamentals framework, and NIS2 Netherlands for software vendors and IT providers, useful if your MES or ERP is hosted by a third party. On OT risk itself, see industrial controllers exposed on the internet.

At CyberNovaLabs.io

Start with the free NIS2 check: in a few minutes it tells you whether the six Annex II categories catch you, and at which level. The NIS2 Netherlands — manufacturing page sets out the thresholds and the competent authorities. For the board training the Cbw requires, see our in-company training. And if you want a second pair of eyes on your own case, tell us in two lines what you manufacture: we answer on scope, not with a quote.

Sources

  1. Rijksoverheid — Cyberbeveiligingswet en Wet weerbaarheid kritieke entiteiten vanaf 15 augustus 2026 van kracht
  2. RDI — De Cyberbeveiligingswet treedt in werking (15/08/2026)
  3. RDI — Resultaten NIS2-Quickscan, sector vervaardiging
  4. NCSC — Veelgestelde vragen Cyberbeveiligingswet (NIS2)
  5. Cyberbeveiligingswet, Staatsblad 2026, 187 — art. 26 à 29 (meldplicht), art. 80 et 87 (bestuurlijke boete)
  6. RDI — Cyberbeveiligingswet (toezicht et NIS2-Zelfevaluatie)
  7. EUR-Lex — Directive (UE) 2022/2555 (NIS2), annexe II
  8. CMS — Cyberbeveiligingswet voor fabrikanten van medische hulpmiddelen (toezicht IGJ)
  9. NCSC — DTC en NCSC vanaf 2026 verder als versterkt NCSC
  10. Cyberweerbaarheidscentrum Maakindustrie (FME, Koninklijke Metaalunie, HSD)
  11. NCTV — Informatiebrochure Cyberbeveiligingswet 2026 (omvangscriteria)
CyberNovaLabs.io

Qualified meetings, no lock-in.

Criteria in writing before launch, pay per meeting or monthly, stop with a simple email.

→ Get meetings booked

Read next

November 3, 2026 · 7 min read

Belgian tax portal attacked: deadline moved (28/10/2026)

Four days without MyMinfin, Tax-on-Web or Biztax, and a filing deadline that did not move. No data was stolen, so the cost sits elsewhere. What the Belgian tax portal cyberattack changes in practice for an SME in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Luxembourg.

Read the article →
November 3, 2026 · 9 min read

AI Act 2026: what SMEs actually need to know

Applicable since 2 August 2026, the AI Act comes down to three duties for an SME that buys AI. The heavy Annex III rules now wait until 2 December 2027. Here are the dates, the fine ceilings that actually apply to an SME, and who enforces in the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Luxembourg.

Read the article →
October 27, 2026 · 8 min read

NIS2 Belgium: are accounting firms and fiduciaries in scope?

Accounting appears in neither Annex I nor Annex II of the Belgian Act of 26 April 2024. But a fiduciary that runs its clients' IT can become a managed ICT service provider, and every firm feels the supply chain pressure of its in-scope clients.

Read the article →
October 26, 2026 · 7 min read

Belgium: 47 entities hit by data breaches in 2026 (24/10/2026)

Dark web monitoring, confirmed by the Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium, counts at least 47 Belgian entities hit by a data breach since January 2026. Incident reports received by the CCB have already passed the full-year 2025 total. Here is the useful reading for an SME in our four countries, plus the list to clear this week.

Read the article →
October 25, 2026 · 8 min read

NIS2 France: are healthcare providers and labs in scope?

Health sits in Annex I of NIS2, yet no NIS2 obligation is enforceable in France on 25 October 2026. Meanwhile a separate French decree already requires five categories of care providers, medical labs included, to report incidents without delay. Here is which, and what to do.

Read the article →
October 24, 2026 · 8 min read

NIS2 Luxembourg: are transport and logistics firms in scope?

Luxembourg's law does not put road hauliers inside NIS2. It puts road authorities, intelligent transport system operators, aviation, rail and ports there — and, through Annex II, forwarding services. Here is how to settle your own case, with the articles, the authority and the real deadlines.

Read the article →
Newsletter · CyberNovaLabs.io

Security Briefing

One email a month: a figure from our barometer, the NIS2 and CRA dates that matter in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, and one practical guide. In English. Unsubscribe in one click.

→ Get meetings booked